International Journal of Cancer Management

Published by: Kowsar
Crossmark

The Outcome of Primary Architectural Distortion in Mammography: Which are the Important Factors?

Afsaneh Alikhassi ORCID 1 , * , Bahareh Hatami 1 and Nasrin Ahmadinejad 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of Cancer Management: June 30, 2019, 12 (6); e91323
  • Published Online: June 18, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 6, 2019
  • Revised: May 28, 2019
  • Accepted: June 1, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.91323

To Cite: Alikhassi A, Hatami B, Ahmadinejad N. The Outcome of Primary Architectural Distortion in Mammography: Which are the Important Factors?, Int J Cancer Manag. 2019 ; 12(6):e91323. doi: 10.5812/ijcm.91323.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Boyer B, Russ E. Anatomical-radiological correlations: Architectural distortions. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.01.003. [PubMed: 24529951].
  • 2. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology. 1996;199(3):811-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638010. [PubMed: 8638010].
  • 3. Knutzen AM, Gisvold JJ. Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(5):454-60. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60194-3. [PubMed: 8479209].
  • 4. Shaheen R, Schimmelpenninck CA, Stoddart L, Raymond H, Slanetz PJ. Spectrum of diseases presenting as architectural distortion on mammography: Multimodality radiologic imaging with pathologic correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011;32(4):351-62. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.008. [PubMed: 21782125].
  • 5. Si L, Zhai R, Liu X, Yang K, Wang L, Jiang T. MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(2):141-50. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15017. [PubMed: 26899149]. [PubMed Central: PMC4790065].
  • 6. Bahl M, Baker JA, Kinsey EN, Ghate SV. Architectural distortion on mammography: Correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(6):1339-45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14628. [PubMed: 26587943].
  • 7. Sekine K, Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Kikuchi M, Saida Y, Kawasaki T, Suzuki K. DCIS showing architectural distortion on the screening mammogram - comparison of mammographic and pathological findings. Breast Cancer. 2007;14(3):281-4. [PubMed: 17690505].
  • 8. Gaur S, Dialani V, Slanetz PJ, Eisenberg RL. Architectural distortion of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):W662-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10153. [PubMed: 24147494].
  • 9. Pinochet Tejos MA, Altamirano Salazar AV, Horvath Polos E, Uchida Silva M, Silva Fuente-Alba C, Darras Ismael C. [Distorsion de la arquitectura mamaria: La mejor forma de enfrentarla]. Revista Chilena de Radiología. 2016;22(4):158-63. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.rchira.2016.11.007.
  • 10. Alshafeiy TI, Nguyen JV, Rochman CM, Nicholson BT, Patrie JT, Harvey JA. Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography. Radiology. 2018;288(1):38-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171159. [PubMed: 29584593].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments