International Journal of Cancer Management

Published by: Kowsar

Designing and Psychometric Evaluation of Breast Self-Examination Behavior Predicting Scale (BSEBPS)

Fatemeh Pourhaji 1 and Fazlollah Ghofranipour 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Health Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of Cancer Management: December 31, 2018, 11 (12); e74266
  • Published Online: December 23, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 4, 2018
  • Revised: November 17, 2018
  • Accepted: November 19, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.74266

To Cite: Pourhaji F, Ghofranipour F . Designing and Psychometric Evaluation of Breast Self-Examination Behavior Predicting Scale (BSEBPS), Int J Cancer Manag. 2018 ; 11(12):e74266. doi: 10.5812/ijcm.74266.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. [PubMed: 25220842].
  • 2. Didarloo A, Nabilou B, Khalkhali HR. Psychosocial predictors of breast self-examination behavior among female students: An application of the health belief model using logistic regression. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4880-9. [PubMed: 29100508]. [PubMed Central: PMC5670517].
  • 3. Azaiza F, Cohen M. Health beliefs and rates of breast cancer screening among Arab women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15(5):520-30. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.520. [PubMed: 16796479].
  • 4. Jazayeri SB, Saadat S, Ramezani R, Kaviani A. Incidence of primary breast cancer in Iran: Ten-year national cancer registry data report. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(4):519-27. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.04.016. [PubMed: 26070507].
  • 5. Yousefi Kashi AS, Yazdanfar S, Akbari ME, Rakhsha A. Triple negative breast cancer in Iranian women: Clinical profile and survival study. Int J Cancer Manage. 2017;10(8). doi: 10.5812/ijcm.10471.
  • 6. Bao Y, Kwok C, Lee CF. Psychometric properties of the modified breast cancer screening beliefs questionnaire among mainland Chinese women. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;28:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.02.006. [PubMed: 28478853].
  • 7. Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Sheyklo SG, Daemi A, Kolahdouzan K, Mohseni M, et al. Breast cancer screening barriers from the womans perspective: A meta-synthesis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(8):3463-71. [PubMed: 25921163].
  • 8. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychol. 2008;57(1):1-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x.
  • 9. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychol Health. 2003;18(1):93-108. doi: 10.1080/0887044021000019358.
  • 10. Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2017;45(3):197-210. doi: 10.1177/0748175612440286.
  • 11. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [PubMed: 17654487].
  • 12. Sklenarova H, Haun MW, Krumpelmann A, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers (SCNS-P&C-G) of cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(6):884-97. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12325. [PubMed: 25939448].
  • 13. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
  • 14. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 5th ed. lippincott williams & wilkins; 2005.
  • 15. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical methods and analyses in health and biosciences a research methodological approach. Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications; 2011. 395 p.
  • 16. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
  • 17. Sarallah S, Sadat TS, Jamshidi AR, Joan W. A multidisciplinary work-related low back pain predictor questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of Iranian patient-care workers. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(3):501-8. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.501. [PubMed: 27340530]. [PubMed Central: PMC4917769].
  • 18. Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press; 2009.
  • 19. Brown T. Methodology in the social sciences. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York, US: Guilford Press; 2015.
  • 20. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis; 2001.
  • 21. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Business Res Meth. 2008;6(1):53-60. doi: 10.21427/d7cf7r.
  • 22. Liu A. Structural equation modeling and latent variable approaches. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource. John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 1-15. doi: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0325.
  • 23. Haghighat S, Montazeri A, Zayeri F, Ebrahimi M, Weiss J. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the lymphedema life impact scale (LLIS, version 1) in breast cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0958-z. [PubMed: 29954381]. [PubMed Central: PMC6025716].
  • 24. Lee JB. Breast cancer fear, mammography fear, and mammography adherence of African American women in Bridgeport, Connecticut. New York University; 2011.
  • 25. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
  • 26. Smith SM, Ford JS, Rakowski W, Moskowitz CS, Diller L, Hudson MM, et al. Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(10):1585-95. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9587-5. [PubMed: 20506037]. [PubMed Central: PMC2941535].
  • 27. Schwarzer R, Renner B. Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: Action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 2000;19(5):487-95. [PubMed: 11007157].
  • 28. Schwarzer R, Sniehotta FF, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schüz B, et al. On the assessment and analysis of variables in the health action process approach: Conducting an investigation. Berlin. Freie Universität Berlin; 2003.
  • 29. Amoran OE, Toyobo OO. Predictors of breast self-examination as cancer prevention practice among women of reproductive age-group in a rural town in Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2015;56(3):185-9. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.160362. [PubMed: 26229226]. [PubMed Central: PMC4518334].
  • 30. Tabari F, Abbaszadeh R, Torabi S, Amini F. Barriers of breast self-examination: A review study from Iranian researchers. Bali Med J. 2017;6(3):562. doi: 10.15562/bmj.v6i3.639.
  • 31. Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: The health action process approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56(3):161-70. doi: 10.1037/a0024509. [PubMed: 21767036].
  • 32. Prestwich A, Conner M, Lawton R, Bailey W, Litman J, Molyneaux V. Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychol Health. 2005;20(6):743-60. doi: 10.1080/14768320500183335.
  • 33. Kim SH, Whitt W. The power of alternative Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests based on transformations of the data. ACM Transact Model Comput Simulat. 2015;25(4):1-22. doi: 10.1145/2699716.
  • 34. Rimal RN, Juon HS. Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;40(2):287-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x.
  • 35. Garcia K, Mann T. From 'I wish' to 'I will': Social-cognitive predictors of behavioral intentions. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(3):347-60. doi: 10.1177/13591053030083005. [PubMed: 14670213].
  • 36. Rohani H, Eslami AA, Ghaderi A, Bidkhori M, Raei M. Development and psychometric evaluation of a health action process approach inventory for healthful diet among type 2 diabetes patients. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:69. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.181333. [PubMed: 27195101]. [PubMed Central: PMC4863400].
  • 37. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. [PubMed: 11148297].
  • 38. Daniel AO, Enoma IO, Omobude-Idiado SN. Application of protection motivation theory (PMT) and health action process approach (HAPA) in promoting women's adaptive engagement towards breast self examination. Academic Res Int. 2014;5(1):291.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments