International Journal of Cancer Management

Published by: Kowsar

Current Status of the Fetography: Preventing of the Future Radiation Induced Cancer

Mansour Zabihzadeh 1 , 2 and Vahid Karami 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Physics, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
2 Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention: January 2017, 10 (1); e5209
  • Published Online: September 19, 2016
  • Article Type: Brief Report
  • Received: December 30, 2015
  • Revised: January 26, 2016
  • Accepted: September 10, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijcp-5209

To Cite: Zabihzadeh M, Karami V. Current Status of the Fetography: Preventing of the Future Radiation Induced Cancer, Int J Cancer Manag. 2017 ; 10(1):e5209. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-5209.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P, et al. Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(2): 75-100[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Dowd SB, Tilson ER. Practical radiation protection and applied radiobiology. 1999;
  • 3. Hohl C, Wildberger JE, Suss C, Thomas C, Muhlenbruch G, Schmidt T, et al. Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield. Acta Radiol. 2006; 47(6): 562-7[PubMed]
  • 4. McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics. 2007; 27(4): 909-17[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Chaparian A, Aghabagheri M. Fetal radiation doses and subsequent risks from X-ray examinations: Should we be concerned? Iran J Reprod Med. 2013; 11(11): 899-904[PubMed]
  • 6. Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill's atlas of radiographic positioning & procedures. 2007;
  • 7. Diagnostic Radiology and Pregnancy. 2015;
  • 8. Giles D, Hewitt D, Stewart A, Webb J. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet. 1956; 271(6940): 447[PubMed]
  • 9. Doll R, Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70: 130-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Wakeford R. Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or after birth. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 132(2): 166-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Bailey HD, Armstrong BK, de Klerk NH, Fritschi L, Attia J, Lockwood L, et al. Exposure to diagnostic radiological procedures and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(11): 2897-909[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Lawler PR, Abrahamowicz M, Richard H, Pilote L. Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ. 2011; 183(4): 430-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(9): 849-57[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments